Saturday, May 13, 2023
Relative History
Saturday, June 18, 2022
My Own Music History – Beginnings
Sunday, May 1, 2022
My Own Music History #2
Wednesday, February 16, 2022
My Own Music History #1 - Memory
Monday, July 19, 2021
temporal displacement
Sometimes my posts can serve as something of a diary, with the dates out of sequence. The same thing holds true about my studio releases. I had been a songwriter for decades prior to producing or releasing anything, with many songs written long ago that are now brand new.
Information is like that. Even if it's ancient history, it's brand new information upon its discovery. New information? Mostly that hindsight can lend greater perspective. The old adage "hindsight is 20/20" is not really true; because, some will pick apart the past unto false narratives.
Because people experience time in such a linear way, it's so very common to put boundaries within certain states of being. We exist societally in a certain way, unto a certain point, and then that moment passes unto the next. I know many people are beginning to question this way of being. Are stages or levels really appropriate in all circumstances?
Perhaps, as long as vastly differing levels of intelligences exist, this mustneeds be so. Not so, however, that human compassion should be so limited as to negate humanity's well-being on a larger scale -- nor limited by humans by way of algorithms and "all-the-buzz" of AI.
Be gentle, o' masters of the maths...and I mean those yet to come. Those now postulate upon a flash, indicating nothing.
Thursday, July 15, 2021
a consideration
Sunday, July 4, 2021
Wane #02
Wane #01
Wednesday, June 9, 2021
An Essay - From Horseshit to Atom-Split
The era of the woke, the heightened political correctness...and the cancel culture? How do human beings collectively view information?
For me, the reasons concern attributes of our species which make me question everything about technology; not that anything in and of itself is intrinsically bad, per se. This sentiment will boil down to capability and potentiality. Human beings seem to be fairly base creatures still, wholly incapable of the technology we wield collectively. Really. My great-grandparents lived similarly to how the Amish live — born in a time before public utilities were even widespread. So, oil-lamps, candles, horses, wells, trash-burning, burning wood and coal, and outhouses were all normal parts of everyday life.
Speaking of narrative, there is this conspiratorial notion that something extra-terrestrial happened in New Mexico in 1947. The story goes in many different tangents depending on where you look, but it pertains to this collective idea that 1) advanced alien civilizations have visited earth; 2) an alien spacecraft, possibly occupied, crash-landed on Earth in New Mexico in 1947; 3) the controlling forces of our globe — whether governmental or corporate (or both) have reversed engineered this technology from said craft; 4) the controlling forces of our globe hide all of this from the rest of the population for profit.
I look at this with story with great curiosity, perhaps like many others in the last 75 years — except there are very strange attributes to this tale. Why does this narrative even exist? Why does it fascinate the public to the degree that many would argue this as factual?
Information is something more significant than is commonly realized. It influences relative time. If only small amounts of information are allowed to permeate collective consciousness, the collective fills in the blanks. I would surmise that this is a deliberate exercise by those who can control information. Like a dystopian Mad Libs, the blanks become filled with nonsense and suddenly all sorts of paranoid delusions are borne throughout time — viewed as fact. I can't go so far as to postulate this attribute as the beginnings of religion itself directly; however it is not beyond the realm of speculation.
The reason I bring up the Roswell postulation is not only as an example of what may be some sort of weird collective delusion, or perhaps that we only have a smattering of the information and the rest has been convoluted around it — but, also to serve as a point of inquiry in regards to our present state as a society on a planetary scale. Sometimes, information is given incorrectly on purpose in order to mislead. This can be done for economic, ideological, or philosophical purposes.
For example, imagine that rather than an alien craft having crash landed in Roswell, NM in 1947 that, if there's any truth at all to any of it, it happened much earlier than that. Perhaps it is more reasonable to fathom that this happened in 1847 instead. This is something that I am addressing without researching every term about which I write. How could I? Yes, there is a lot of reference material, but look at what we're referencing. It is something that, as of this writing, has not been officially acknowledged as fact. If we look at the technological development of our species, for example, humanity has stayed amazingly consistent in primitive ways of living right up until the American Civil War. Granted, there were developments before that too that seem extremely pivotal — but not as frequent nor monumentally so as the succession of innovations surrounding the turn of the 20th century. If we think in terms of information, obviously the printing press was huge but had been around for centuries by the time of the Industrial Revolution. The steam engine and the telegraph really ushered in a time where information could be more greatly manipulated as bits of it could be released faster. History is written, oftentimes incorrectly, after the fact. This brought the level of narrative to a national scale — really the beginnings of a global scale. What was next? Human beings are dirty, ignorant, base creatures, but still capable of great imaginings. People can be fairly smart sometimes, in very small numbers. The cotton gin, the printing press, the steam engine...these are things that are not beyond reason to speculate — that humans had come up with this technology. Whether true or not, this is philosophical speculation based on commonly-known things, if any of it had bases to begin with. When we get to things like electricity in every home, the telegraph and the telephone...ok, also not beyond human intelligence perhaps. However, there was a lot more going on too. The photograph and phonograph too? Information could be sent instantaneously via telegraph, which really would have been the first internet structure. The automobile. Then telephone. Then radio. The technology for television was (publicly) realized during the Great Depression. If you listen to old-time radio broadcasts from that era, they discuss the excitement around this technology. It was not until the mid 1950s, however, that TV "sets" became widely available. Before this, television programming was scant too. But, it is the way technology is released. It is a manner that seems to be a scam at its core.
If someone were to have had digital technology in the 19th century, they could have made millions, right? Imagine if that technology were ripped apart schematically and released incrementally over hundreds of years. Imagine that there are more technologically advanced species involved in this process. There would have to be. Like Star Trek though, I would imagine a species with a space-faring technology to also have an advanced consciousness...and though that's the hope, I don't see this as being clearly so, unless our own consciousness itself is an advanced simulation.
Around the same time, we get the airplane. Holy Toledo. Then it takes off as if it were all a natural progression of human events. Does it seem like the natural progression of human events? Look at all of human history and development. There is something afoot about which we have incomplete information. This pertains to physics itself, I reckon — the controlling of a population unto a purpose. Human beings then go from being able to fly, right to the computer age — all information and innovation being released as slowly as possible to maximize profit in so doing...like going from records, to cassettes, to 8-tracks, to compact discs, for example.
It seems like humanity went from shoveling horse shit to splitting the atom.
It really looks like technology from an advanced civilization was dumped onto humanity without the benefit of humanity having any real advanced knowledge - nor knowledge throughout. There's advancement for the benefit of all humankind, only by virtue of trickle-down economics? These are not advanced ethics at all, except for the purposes of exploitation. "Divide and conquer" is not exactly a new tactic — yet one that people seem especially blind to en masse.
These ideas can be viewed from the basis of logic and reason as to what has been the collective capacity of humankind unto a point. Human understanding of time has undoubtedly been deliberately effected by manipulating information unto purposes of control.
Thursday, May 13, 2021
past, present, or future?
Friday, March 12, 2021
What?
It occurs to me that there are people out there whom shall be very curious indeed as to the things I will share.
That's what I mean about living history. How will it be known as to the nuance lost, were it not uttered? And then we define our reality based on a chosen historical perception, while we catalog facts. The facts themselves are horrible; but, we as a species want to feel like we're moving forward no matter the cost. The cost is only calculated later. This is how it is and has been for all of humanity - always.
Individually, do we live any differently? Collective delusions inform us individually, but only as related to the social whole.
What do I mean by that? Am I saying everyone is deluded? Yes. How could I say that? Let me just give the most overt example. Let's imagine I have $10 in my pocket. What does that mean? This is a small piece of fancy paper that someone printed the number "10" upon. It has value in trade because we believe it does.
Irrespective, because of this belief, were one not to have that special numerical paper, one wouldn't be able to buy commodities that number is believed to be valid for in trade. On this simple basis, people live and die every day.
In the era of developing industry and beforehand, there was a different economic construct that made such a system more believable and therefore more sustainable. The value of gold and silver used to determine our economic realities - for thousands and thousands of years. The United States stopped making coins out of precious metal in 1964. If you find a dime, quarter, fifty-cent piece, or silver dollar minted before 1964, hold on to it! It's numerical attribution is much higher than its face-value.
Shit. Now I can't get my coffee because I misplaced my fancy green piece of paper. Whew! I found it. Now I'm worth something.
An Essay on Our Linear Selves
History is a funny thing. I've been keenly aware all of my life that we're all living within our own versions of a greater historical reality. That awareness, however, has not been bereft of delusion - whether imposed, at my own insistence, by society itself, or a combination of both.
But it's the world we live in, isn't it? Full of treachery, horror, and the dichotomy of extreme beauty and love, all at the same time. Perhaps this is analogous to our lives too: we are all beings of infinite capability, hampered by much, ultimately amounting to a commemorative stone if we're lucky. Perhaps too, this is all analogous to the nature of illusion.
The condition itself seems absurd with which to contend, from a logical sense. Within that realization lies it's own horror. How do we respond? Do we bow to the horror show, cowering in fear? No. We meander forth, cowering in fear in other ways - individually - as both introverts and extroverts.
Collectively, I think we deny our greater selves societally in lieu of selfish comforts and perceptions to our own detriment as a species, by design of controlled sociological evolution. Such conditions of society will evolve naturally, of course, the results of which are somewhat controlled.
We base so much value, attention, and energy on this society constructed on greed and accumulation. It has not really changed since time immemorial, this concept of self-entitlement. We have the capacity at this point in history, however, to take remarkable strides forward as a species. The best parts of humankind can be revealed, were they not held back by the imposed division of peoples on geo-political/socio-economic constructs.
It is said that we in society have lost a connection through being more connected than ever, ironically. We've lost social nuance. We've become more isolated and introverted, casting aspersions and labels upon others as if our own morality or even mental health were the paradigm upon which measurement should be based. We have lost what is called a "common myth". We have no believable destination as a society as a result of corruption and conspiracy - that which everyone knows about; some might be in varying degrees of denial about this, but most people even begrudgingly know that our perceived reality has changed. What is left is a shell holding together a framework on the basis of crumbling nostalgia. Shall it be chaos that ensues from such allowance? Is such chaos inevitable? And, my big question: Is it by design? (In my mind, these are rhetorical questions.)
Relative History
I think my mother was attempting to groom me towards greatness, in the hopes that I would get close by social standards of the day. This is ...
-
I think my mother was attempting to groom me towards greatness, in the hopes that I would get close by social standards of the day. This is ...
-
So...what went so wrong, so dark? Who's to say the darkness hasn't reached everyone? Once upon a time I told tales of how we were pi...
-
I have the story I tell – the narrative, as it were, but there are strange and murky details intertwined, heretofore undisclosed. Untold beg...